This website uses only technical or equivalent cookies.
For more information click here.

Register Login Submit an Article

PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND REGENERATIVE SURGERY

Abstract

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Donor availability is lower than demand, therefore suboptimal grafts retrieved from donors after brain death with expanded criteria donors (EC-DBD) and from donors after cardiac death (DCD) are increasingly used. These organs carry a higher risk of worse clinical outcomes, and subsequently need more advanced preservation systems than static cold storage (SCS). Hypothermic perfusion represents one of the aforementioned strategies. This review summarizes the main features of hypothermic perfusion: its mechanism of action through analysis of preclinical models and its clinical efficacy in kidney transplantation with a focus on marginal donors. Oxygenated hypothermic perfusion was also evaluated focusing on its potential benefits on cell metabolism and graft immungenicity. Finally, as hypothermic perfusion not only allows to recover marginal grafts, but may also recondition grafts unsuitable for transplantation, the possible methods of graft evaluation and treatment options during perfusion are described in this review.

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), granting better outcomes compared to dialysis both in terms of patient survival and quality of life 1.

Donors’ availability is limited if compared to the request for organs to be transplanted. In fact, a significant proportion of patients dies on the waiting list (mortality rate on the waiting list: 2.4%) or waits for a long time with an average waiting time on list: 3.2 years, reaching transplant in poor health conditions 2.

In 2002, the American United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) proposed to increase the pool of donor kidneys to include expanded criteria donors (ECD), for which the relative risk of graft failure (return to dialysis or patient death) was estimated to be 1.7-fold higher than kidney transplant recipients from standard criteria donor (SCD) 3. ECDs are defined as donors after brain death (DBD) > 60 years of age or between 50-60 years of age with two of the following characteristics: arterial hypertension (AHT), creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL, or death from a cerebrovascular accident 4.

The original intent of the donor criteria expansion was to list for ECD kidneys only patients for whom the compromise of lower graft survival was offset by a shorter time in transplant waiting list. Nevertheless, in some cases the graft survival of ECD kidneys resulted better compared to that of SCD kidneys.

The kidney donor profile index (KDPI) was developed to improve risk stratification in terms of survival after deceased donor kidney transplant, to provide a more granular index of risk for donor kidneys and to locate them on a continuum basis 5. Calculation of the KDPI includes ten variably weighted donor parameters: for example, age has the highest negative impact in the KDPI algorithm, especially if a donor is above 50 years or below 18 years 6. These grafts are more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and have an increased risk of post-transplant complications such as primary non-function (PNF) and delayed graft function (DGF) and are also characterized with unfavorable graft survival rates 7-10. Moreover, given their immunogenic potential, they have an increased risk of developing acute and chronic rejection in the post-transplant period 11. Therefore, these organs require more elaborate preservation systems than static cold storage (SCS), in which the kidney is only flushed at the time of procurement using a preservation solution. This method has been the treatment of choice for several years due to its simplicity, low costs and the constant development of more refined perfusion fluids.

The first perfusion machine models were developed in the United States by Humpries et al. in 1960s who successfully performed an auto-kidney transplant on a canine model after 24-hour storage using cryopreserved plasma in a pulsatile perfusion pump and later by Belzer et al. 12,13. At the beginning of the solid organ transplantation era, perfusion machines were extensively used since they were considered to be the only safe method of storing grafts. In 1969 Collins et al. demonstrated a method for storing and transporting renal grafts on ice in a storage solution. These perfusion solutions progressively became more elaborate providing increasingly better results and thus reducing the success of perfusion machines and establishing the beginning of SCS era 14.

However, during the last twenty years, the increase in marginal grafts utilization has prompted research to find alternative methods of preservation. In 2009 a landmark study on hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) by Moers et al. was published, starting a new chapter in organ preservation 15.

Currently, ex-vivo perfusion machines use different temperature settings (hypothermia, sub-normothermia, normothermia), oxygen support (normobaric or hyperbaric) and application of therapeutic agents (e.g. nutrition, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic additives, mesenchymal stromal cells [MSCs], or MSCs releasing extracellular vesicles [EV]) 16-21.

Contrary to SCS, whose purpose was to allow organ preservation and transportation without damage, the main goal of ex-vivo mechanized perfusion is to improve and even recover organs. This setting has led to a paradigm shift, in which not only reliable preservation of an organ with standard criteria is expected, but also damage reduction and improvement in the vitality of a “marginal” organ, through the removal of waste products and the administration of metabolic substrates, can be achieved in order to increase the pool of transplantable organs 11,22.

The aim of this review is to analyze the potential benefits of hypothermic perfusion methods from research to clinical practice and to assess its future perspectives.

HYPOTHERMIC MACHINE PERFUSION

Mechanism of action through pre-clinical models

During hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) a cold acellular preservation solution (4-8°C) circulates through the renal artery by a perfusion pump 23. Grafts are connected to the perfusion device by a single-use sterile kit and the vessels are cannulated with a specific cannula. To perform oxygenation of the organs during perfusion, it is possible to use a membrane oxygenator integrated in the perfusion circuit. The flow and pressure values during perfusion are self-regulated, measured by specific sensors and displayed on the device screen 24. To avoid kidney oedema and endothelial damage, pressure is to be kept between 25 and 30 mmHg into the renal artery 11.

The most used preservation solutions are Belzer MPS® UW (Machine Perfusion Solution University of Wisconsin) or Celsior® (Institut George Lopez, IGL), which both guarantee an adequate intake of nutrients and electrolytes for graft preservation before transplantation 25.

In terms of composition, the UW solution contains osmotic components such as raffinose and hydroxyethyl starch, mixed with a phosphate buffer and a high potassium content, adenosine as a nucleotide precursor, allopurinol, which acts as a free radical scavenger, dexamethasone, insulin and penicillin. The Celsior® solution, on the other hand, is high in sodium, low in potassium and low in viscosity; it is also characterized by a high buffering capacity and contains ketoglutarate as an energy substrate 24.

Various hypothermic machine perfusion devices are currently avaible: LifePort® (Organ Recovery Systems; Itaca, Illinois), Kidney Assist® (OrganAssist; Groningen, Netherlands), Waters RM3® kidney perfusion system (Rochester, Minnesota), Waves IGL® (Lyon, France) 11 and VitaSmart TM Machine Perfusion (Bridge to Life, Europe) 24. One of the primary differences between devices is that some are pressure-driven (e.g., LifePort and Kidney Assist), whilst others are flow-driven (e.g., RM3 system). Some devices are portable for administering HMP from the end of organ retrieval. The VitaSmart (Bridge to Life, Europe) is a non-portable multi-organ device to add oxygenation to end-ischemic hypothermic perfusion 27.

Several pre-clinical and clinical models review and meta-analysis have compared outcomes of HMP and SCS when used with DBD, EC-DBD and DCD donor grafts (Tab. I).

The actual mechanisms behind transplantation outcomes improvement when HMP is used are not completely clarified; undeniably, HMP provides the kidney graft with all the needed nutrients and removes toxic metabolites and free radicals 28.

During hypothermia, cellular metabolism is reduced to 5-10% and ATP depletion, oxygen consumption and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production are consequently reduced 29. Pulsating pressure mechanism carries out shear stress forces upon the vessel’s walls, maintaining normal endothelial cells morphology and activating Kruppel-like 2 (KLF2) transcription factor through extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 5, extracellular signal-related kinase 5 e myocyte enhancer factor 2 transcription pathways 30. Indeed, Gallinat et al. demonstrated KLF2 upregulation, endothelin 1 downregulation and – most of all – upregulation of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) during HMP, leading to vasodilation and microcirculation improvement in the kidney cortex 31. Chatauret et al. showed the same results, demonstrating kidney cortex microcirculation improvement right after reperfusion in porcine DCD models subjected to HMP 32. HMP subjected grafts also showed increased levels of Akt and Erk phosphorylation, both fundamental in cellular survival via pro-apoptotic markers downregulation and anti-apoptotic markers upregulation 33.

Besides, despite hypotermia and anoxya, central metabolism pathways are kept active through glycolytic and non-glycolytic pathways; Nath et al. demonstrated increased levels of eight main metabolites such as lactate, glutamate, fumarate, aspartate and acetate in HMP subjected grafts 34.

Finally, this preservation method prevents reperfusion damage after ischemia, caused by several different factors. First, hypotension is frequent in donors, and it often requires administration of vasoconstrictors, leading to renal hypoperfusion and low intake of oxygen and nutrients; cold ischemia and graft manipulation during organ retrieval also play a role in this condition 35. Moreover, brain death and intracranial hypertension may release great amounts of cytokines and growth factors, worsening renal ischemia 36. Notably, endothelial cells and kidney tubule cells are most affected by oxygen deficiency and both hypoxia and ATP degradation create ROS and provide an acidic microenvironment, which further damage the cell membrane. ATP-dependent membrane pumps, especially Na/K+ ATPase, stop functioning without ATP with subsequent accumulation of intracellular K+ and extracellular Na+ 11. In this environment, the re-establishiment of blood flow induces inflammation, an increase in reactive oxygen species and the release of cytokines by white blood cells 37. Reactive oxygen species mediate mitochondrial damage and activation of the apoptotic pathway 38. HMP is effective in this setting by reducing the concentration of cytokines (interleukin 1b, interleukin 2 and TNF-a), apoptotic mechanism and caspase-3 expression by ezrin/AKT pathways 39.

Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion

Hypothermia does not completely interrupt cell metabolism. Therefore, the addition of oxygen during hypothermic perfusion could satisfy the remaining metabolic demand by replenishing ATP stores through aerobic metabolism, which prevents damaging processes such as cell swelling, apoptosis, necrosis and ischemia-reperfusion damage 22.

Actually, hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) is performed using a machine perfusion solution (Belzer MPS® UW Machine Perfusion Solution University of Wisconsin or Celsior® – Institut George Lopez, IGL), with a partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) between 450 mmHg and 750 mmHg and a renal artery pressure of 25-30 mmHg. Several animal and preclinical studies were performed to investigate the role of oxygen administration in hypothermic conditions (Tab. II).

A large part of the studies has analyzed DCD animal models, a category of donors most susceptible to post-transplant complications, following the good results obtained on DCD donor liver transplants undergoing HOPE 40.

A study by Kron et al. compares various methods of storage for DCD kidney rodent models: cold storage, cold storage and normothermic perfusion, cold storage and HOPE and cold storage and hypothermic de-oxygenated perfusion (HNPE). HOPE-treated DCD kidneys showed better function after transplantation than cold-stored grafts. Moreover, this study showed several benefits, being HOPE demonstrated to prevent macrophage activation with less TLR-4 positive cells, less TNF-a release and to prevent endothelial cells activation after implantation 41.

In addition, HOPE treatment prevents mitochondrial ROS production, although the addition of oxygen could lead to an increase in the production of reactive oxygen species resulting in cellular damage. However, a study by Hoyer et al. demonstrated improved flow and lower resistance within the renal parenchyma with HMP at 100% O2 reflecting vascular and endothelial function and integrity. Furthermore, cell integrity is also supported by lower LDH values, lower tubular dilatation and lower gGT values, markers of tubular damage in urine. In this study, after two hours of perfusion, graft function has been demonstrated to be significantly superior compared to HMP without oxygenation 42.

Moreover, a study by Patel et al. compared porcine kidney DCD models subjected to hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HPM/95% O2) or subjected to HPM aerated (HPM/air). This study showed that hypothermic perfusion at high oxygen concentrations (95% O2) increases the production of tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates and thus ATP, improves flow dynamics at the renal cortical level and does not increase the production of reactive oxygen species 43.

In a trial by Thuiller et al., the positive results of oxygenated HMP were confirmed by the 3-month follow-up. Two weeks after transplantation, porcine DCD model treated with oxygenated HMP had lower creatinine values and three months after transplantation, renal fibrosis indices were lower than the cohort who was not treated with oxygen 44.

One of the problems of oxygen supply is the timing. In fact, reducing the time to a short period could add several benefits, especially logistic management 27.

Darius et al. 45 analyzed porcine DCD models who underwent autotransplantation after a 30 minutes warm ischemia time that were randomized to different perfusion strategies: 2 hours of oxygenation during HMP either at the start (n = 6), or end of the perfusion, for a total of 22 h HMP. Outcomes were compared to standard, nonoxygenated HMP and continuous oxygenated HMP. The aim was to determine the optimal conditions for hypothermic kidney storage in order to supply an effective oxygenation and to afford an easy logistic management during donation and grafts’ transport.

All the grafts that underwent oxygenation had a better early graft function measured on creatinine levels if compared to the group with exclusive hypothermic perfusion. Two hours of O2 administration at the start of HMP was superior to end-ischemic O2 supply during HMP and equivalent to the continuous oxygenation group.

Metabolic profile achieved in the perfusate (reduction of lactates, succinate and FMN) and in renal tissues (low expression of Nrf2 and HIF-1a) suggests that O2 supply at the beginning of HMP could be an easier and better storage strategy to protect mitochondrion from free radicals damage and improve early graft function if compared to standard HMP and O2 supply at the end of HMP, achieving results that are comparable to continuous HOPE.

Such strategy could be interesting especially for DCD kidneys since it allows to correct oxygen debt due to warm ischemia, which is typical of these grafts, and facilitate organ transport.

Another important aspect of oxygenated hypothermic perfusion seems to be its action on the immune system. Innate and adaptive immunity are activated upon reperfusion when a superoxide burst from the mitochondrial respiratory chain induces tissue injury and damage associated molecular patterns 46.

A study by Kron et al. demonstrated the beneficial effects of HOPE on the immune response after allogeneic transplantation in murine models. In fact, in kidney recipients treated with HOPE without any immunosuppression, a lower immune response was observed, as assessed by a lower release of cytokines, T-cell activation and macrophages. In addition, these grafts showed better function and less fibrosis, resulting in significantly improved survival of the recipients, compared to untreated allogeneic controls (no HOPE, no immunosuppression) 47.

CLINICAL STUDIES

The 2009 study by Moers et al. opened a new chapter for the perfusion machine clinical utilization. In this randomized controlled trial, 672 transplants were randomly assigned to HPM or SCS and analyzed: HPM was demonstrated to reduce the risk of DGF (primary endpoint). In addition, a subgroup analysis including kidneys from EC-DBD demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of DGF and higher 1-year graft survival in machine-perfused kidneys compared with cold-stored kidneys 48.

After this study and with the increasing use of marginal grafts, several meta-analyses of randomised trials comparing HPM with SCS were performed (Tab. III).

O’Callaghan et al. carried out a meta-analysis of eighteen studies (7 RCTs and 11 non-RCTs) comparing hypothermic machine perfusion and static cold storage prior to 2013. Grafts undergoing HMP showed a reduction in the incidence of DGF, no differences in PNF and graft survival at one year, with no difference in the type of donor: DBDs, DCDs and ECDs 49.

A review by Tingle et al. showed that HMP reduces the risk of delayed graft function when compared to SCS. This benefit is significant in both donation following circulatory death and donation following brain death grafts and was demonstrated to be stronger for DCD grafts: in fact, the number of perfusions required to prevent one episode of DGF was 7.26 and 13.60 in DCD and DBD grafts, respectively. The study also showed strong evidence that HMP also improves graft survival in both DBD and DCD grafts, at both 1 and 3 years 50. Comparable results in terms of DGF were also evaluated in the reviews by Peng et al. 51 and Bellini et al. 52, which also showed prolonged 1-year and 3-years survival. On the other hand, there is discordance on the effect of HMP for what concerns PNF rates in those studies 49,51-52.

HMP can be used in various fashions. The aforementioned studies examined continuous HPM, in which perfusion begins immediately after organ retrieval and ends at the time of transplantation; an alternative method is to start perfusion upon arrival of the organ at the transplant centre, after an initial SCS period. One of the main disadvantages of continuous HMP is the necessity to transport the perfusion machine to the organ retrieval site, which could be logistically unfavorable in case of remote periferich hospitals. On the other hand, end-ischemic HMP simplifies retrieval logistics, as transportation of the organs is performed under static cold storage. Moreover, the retrieval surgical staff may come from a different center than the transplant one, and could not be familiar with machine function and settings. A study by Gallinat et al. showed that this second strategy was also superior to SCS 53. Forty-three pairs of kidneys from the same donor were evaluated, one of which underwent SCS alone and the other underwent SCS plus end-ischemic HMP (E-HMP). E-HMP showed better results in terms of PNF (0 vs 9.3%, p = 0.048) and DGF, which resulted as the strongest independent risk factor for 1-year graft survival (RR 38.2, p < 0.001). These results are surprising if we consider that the cold ischaemia time was longer for kidneys reconditioned by e-HMP vs only-SCS (13,4 hours vs 12,1 hours). Furthermore, this method increased the organ acceptance rate of ECD kidneys, as 10% of the SCS- preserved kidneys cohort were discarded by other centers.

Compared with SCS, HMP is expensive. However, looking at the cost-benefit ratio, HPM is advantageous because it reduces the hospitalization time after transplantation and the number of patients undergoing post-transplant dialysis 50.

For what concerns HOPE, there are few clinical studies that have evaluated the addition of oxygen to perfusion (Tab. IV).

A doubleblind paired multicentre RCT by Jochmans et al. published on Lancet in November 2020, was designed to evaluate if the addition of oxygen to hypothermic perfusion, gives additional benefits on graft from DCD donor aged 50 years or older 54. The study population was chosen because it represents the fastest growing source of donor kidneys and kidneys donated after circulatory death are more susceptible to the ischaemiareperfusion damage. The results demonstrated a reduction in severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIb) post-transplant, an improvement in graft survival at 12 months post-transplant, and a reduction in the relative risk of acute rejection in patients treated with oxygenated hypothermic perfusion compared to the control group undergoing HMP alone. The reduction of organ rejection rates is mostly notable, as it contributes to reduce long-term graft survival producing scarring and fibrosis of the kidney tissue. Moreover, the reduction of rejection risk granted through oxygenated perfusion may imply consequences on short-term functional outcomes: in the study, in fact, more than a third (36%) of transplant failures in the HMP group occurred 3 months after transplantation, indicating that immunological factors were most likely at play 54. Finally, these results are consistent with previous animal studies 41,47.

Contrary to end-ischemic HMP, contrasting results emerge from the literature looking at the combination of SCS followed by short-term HOPE. In a prospective randomized multicenter trial by Husen et al., kidneys from expanded criteria donors were randomized to either SCS alone or SCS followed by end-ischemic HOPE 55. There was no difference between the two groups either for the primary end-point (graft survival at 1 year) or for the secondary end-points, which included delayed graft function, primary non-function, acute rejection, estimated glomerular filtration rate and patient survival. The fact that the mean perfusion time was 4.67 hours, with a minimum of two hours, may suggest that a longer or earlier period of oxygen exposure should be employed to obtain clinically relevant results. However, no clinical benefits were noted in kidneys that were perfused for a longer period or after a shorter period of SCS either.

A clinical trial by Ravaioli et al. showed quite different outcomes 56. Each patient included in the study group was transplanted with an ECD graft, trated in the pre-implantation phase with HOPE. Patients’ outcomes in the HOPE (HOPE-K) group were compared to the ones of matched controls, whose organs were preserved by SCS (SCS-K group). The study population showed better outcomes with only 20% DGF rate compared to 40% in the control group; notably, all DGF events in the HOPE-K group occurred when the perfusion time was less than 2 hours. Moreover, comparing K-HOPE patients who received a graft undergoing perfusion treatment for more than 2 hours with grafts with shorter perfusion times, the DGF rate was significantly lower (0 vs 40%, p = 0.04). In the study no graft failure was registered.

Another interesting evidence concerning the benefits of hypothermic oxygen perfusion comes from a case report by the same group 57. Marginal kidneys from a 78-year-old DBD with normal renal function were declined by Italian transplant centers due to bioptic Karpinski’s score (right kidney: 6; left kidney:7). Both kidneys were recovered and preserved by HOPE and their use for transplantation was re-evaluated using perfusion parameters. During perfusion, the left kidney progressively increased its flow by 34% and the right kidney by 50%, thus the kidneys were considered eligible for double-kidney transplant, which was performed successfully. The recipient serum creatinine values at one month and three months after transplantation were in the normal range. The results of this study suggested that HOPE could be a useful tool for re-evaluating and improving the organ quality of marginal kidneys discarded due to histological score, but with adequate pre-donation renal function.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

The benefits of oxygenated and non-oxygenated hypothermic perfusion over standard preservation methods for marginal grafts are well known from preclinical and clinical data. A key question during organ preservation is whether it is possible to predict the likelihood of a kidney graft function recovery by assessing certain parameters on perfusate. The most analyzed markers are lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), glutathione S-transferase (GST), alanine aminopeptidase, N-acetyl-b-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP). In particular, GST levels are closely related to warm ischaemic time (WIT) and are also an independent risk factor for DGF 58. Another marker, urinary neutrophilgelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), results in higher concentrations in grafts that showed lower eGFR levels at subsequent follow-ups 56.

Recent interest was also raised by perfusate concentration of extracellular histones and microRNA-21. Extracellular histones are involved in numerous pathophysiological processes such as sepsis, thrombosis, inflammation, and vascular dysfunction but have not yet been studied in the process of kidney injury and organ viability in a clinical setting of organ donation and transplantation. In a study performed on 390 kidneys from DCD donors, their level correlated with PNF, DGF and graft failure one year after transplantation 59. Pump parameters, such as renal resistance values and perfusion flow indexes registered during hypothermic organ perfusion, appear to be promising parameters to predict graft function 60-62.

Particularly a study by Bissolati et al. shown how resistance values during perfusion can be even more effective than pre-implant histology to predict PNF, DGF rate and postoperative creatinine trend 60.

A recent study evaluated the relationships between pre-implantation biopsy scores and renal parameters during perfusion, finding a positive association between global histologic score, resistance values at start and resistance reduction rate. Nevertheless, histologic score was independently associated with 6-month eGFR 63.

Combined evaluation of biomarkers alone or as conjugate biomarkers, together with pump parameters and histology could allow a safer and effective use of organs otherwise discarded.

One potential tool that can be used in perfusate analysis is metabolomic activity assessment through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. In a study by Guy et al. 64 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy has been used to examine the metabolomic profile of HMP perfusate from human cadaveric kidneys awaiting transplantation and to identify possible discriminators between the profiles of kidneys with delayed graft function and immediate graft function (IGF). The perfusates were evaluated at different times during perfusion. Grafts that developed DGF had lower glucose levels both at the beginning (45 minutes) and at the end of perfusion (4 hours). A difference in inosine, leucine and gluconate levels between the DGF group and the IGF group was also demonstrated 64.

In addition to the ability to predict graft function, another possible application of machine perfusion is the graft reconditioning to improve short- or long-term outcomes or to increase the available organ pool. In this setting, nutrients, therapeutic gases, mesenchymal stromal cells, gene therapies, and nanoparticles could be delivered to effectively repair an extended criteria organ during the preservation period and prior to implantation.

Cell therapy is one of the most widely used reconditioning strategies. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are multipotent cells derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue but also from other tissues such as the umbilical cord. They have similar properties to stem cells, so once they reach the target organ, they can differentiate and interact with various pathophysiological processes 65. In addition to their ability to differentiate, they can transport organelles to damaged cells 66 or secrete growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular vesicles (EV), acting directly on other cells or modifying the surrounding microenvironment 67-70. MSCs also exhibit anti-inflammatory and immune-regulatory properties as demonstrated in a clinical trial by Erpicum et al. 71. In this study, ten deceased donor kidney recipients received bone marrow MSC infusion on 3 ± 2 post-operative days and were compared with 10 case-controls. On post-operative day 7, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the MSC-treated recipients was higher than in the control cases, but no difference in eGFR at 1 year was found. Furthermore, MSC-treated recipients showed an increased percentage of regulatory T-cells and improved early allograft function.

A successful way to deliver MSCs seems to be intra-arterial graft administration, which allows to prolong the survival and contact of cells in-situ, and to avoid the dispersion of cells from the target organ 72. Supplementation of perfusate with MSC during HMP has been assessed in pre-clinical e clinical studies. A study by Gregorini et al. assessed if the administration of MSC-derived EVs or MSCs during HMP protects DCD murine kidneys from ischemic damage. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms were also analyzed. Kidneys were retrieved after 20 minutes of warm ischemia and perfused for 4 h with Belzer Solution (BS) or BS supplemented with MSC or EV. Renal damage was quantified by histology and renal gene expression. Significantly less global ischemic damage was recorded in kidneys subjected to MSC/EV, quantified as fewer histological lesions such as bubble formation, tubular necrosis, tubular lumen obstruction and a reduction in the global renal damage score. Furthermore, up-regulation of genes encoding for membrane ion transporters, higher pyruvate concentration and lower glucose concentration in the perfusion fluid was recorded, suggesting higher energy activity 20.

The same group performed a study on kidneys from DBD-ECD donors deemed unsuitable for transplantation to evaluate if hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) with or without MSC-derived EV and subsequent normothermic reperfusion (NR) with artificial blood composed of bovine hemoglobin (HBOC) could prevent reperfusion injury 73. In fact, conditioning with HOPE+EV and NR arrest the ischemic damage, prevents reoxygenation-dependent injury, and preserves tissue integrity. Indeed, kidneys only subjected to HOPE showed lower levels of COX-IV1, a component of COX, the last enzyme in the mitochondrial electron transport chain, which drives oxidative phosphorylation and is degraded under hypoxic conditions. The mitochondrial alteration was also confirmed by observation under an electron microscope. The increased vitality of the kidneys subjected to HOPE+EV was demonstrated by the IPT (tubular cell proliferation index), higher VEGF and HGF levels, higher glucose and lower lactate concentrations in the perfusate, showing that gluconeogenesis system in HOPE+EV group was preserved. This study suggests that EV delivery during HOPE can be considered a new organ preservation strategy for increasing the donor pool and improving transplant outcome.

Another opportunity offered by organ perfusion could be gene therapy. One of the most promising approaches would seem to be siRNAs (short-interfering RNAs) that induce degradation of homologous mRNA transcripts and block expression of the targeted gene 74. Pre-clinical studies have shown their effectiveness in silencing genes linked to ischemia-reperfusion damage 75, but the problem of target organ specificity and short half-life when administered systemically remains. Administration of these during perfusion could be an advantage in terms of specificity and efficiency 76.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypothermic perfusion reduces the incidence of DGF in ECD-DBD and DCD, which are more susceptible to this type of complication. Further investigations are needed to assess long-term organ function.

Currently oxygenation of perfusate remains controversial; further clinical studies are needed to clarify the effect of different oxygenation parameters.

In addition, further research should be carried out to investigate other aspects such as whether machine parameters and perfusate analysis can predict graft function, and whether the addition of cells and cellular elements can recondition a graft to improve its function and consequently increase the donor pool.

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors’ contributions

GR, GF, MR, GG, MS, GLM: performance of research in medical literature, manuscript draft, final revision.

Ethical consideration

Not applicable.

Figures and tables

Study [ref] Year Model Storage study group Storage control group Outcomes study group
Hendriks, Koen et al. 29 2019 Porcine kidney HMP SCS ↓ ROS
Galinat et al. 31 2014 Porcine kidney Group 2: SCS + HMP (1hour) Group 1: SCS ↓ Endothelin 1 ↑KLF2 (group 3 > 2)
Group 3: SCS + HMP (4hours) ↑ NOS
Chateuret et al. 32 2014 DCD Porcine kidney HMP SCS ↑eNOS renal cortex
↑ artery vasodilatation
He et al. 33 2017 Porcine kidney HMP SCS ↑ Akt, Erk phosphorylation
↓ Na+, Cl-, BUN, LDH
↓ ATP degradation
↓ LD accumulation
Nath et al. 34 2016 DCD Porcine kidney HMP SCS ↑ lactate, glutamate, fumarate, aspartate, acetate
Zhang et al. 39 2016 DCD Rabbit kidney HMP SCS ↓ apoptosis
↓ cleaved caspase-3
↑ezrin
↑ PI3K/AKT pathway
Table I. Preclinical hypothermic machine perfusion studies.
Study [ref] Year Model type Storage study group Storage control group Outcomes
Kron et al. 41 2016 DCD rodent kidney; non-DCD kidney in control group Cold storage SCS (15 minutes) HOPE vs NP ↓ROS ↓ TLR-4 + cell, ↓TNF-a release ↓activation endothelial cells
Cold storage + NP
Cold storage + HOPE
Cold storage + HNPE
Hoyer et al. 42 2014 DCD porcine kidney HMPnoox / HMPox100%: ↑ renale flow ↓renale resistance ↓ LDH ↓ tubular dilatation ↓ gGT
HMPair
HMPox100%
Patel et al. 43 2019 DCD porcine kidney HMP/O2 95% HMP-air HMP/O2 95%: ↑ TCA ↑ ATP ↑ flow dynamics
Thuillier et al. 44 2013 DCD porcine kidney KAnoO2 / KA: ↓ serum creatinine peak ↓ interstitial fibrosis (3 mo: post transplantation)
KA
Kron et al. 47 2019 Rodent kidney Allogeneic untreated Syngeneic control Allogeneic untreated: death by AR
Allogeneic TAC Allogeneic TAC: No rejection
Allogeneic HOPE Allogeneic HOPE: No rejection ↓ fibrotic remodeling ↑ kidney function
Darius et al. 46 2020 DCD porcine kidney 2h HOPE + 20h HMP 22h HMP early graft function 22h-HOPE > 2hHOPE+20hHMP > 20hHMP+2hHOPE > 22h HMP
20h HMP + 2h HMPO2 22h HOPE Renal flow 22h HOPE > 22h HMP
2h HOPE + 20h HMP > 20h HMP + 2h HMPO2 > 22h HMP
Renal resistance 22h HOPE > 22h HMP
2h HOPE + 20h HMP ≈ 20h HMP + 2h HMPO2 > 22h HMP
[Succinate] HMP > 20h HMP + 2h HMPO2 > 22h HOPE > 2h HOPE + 20h HMP
[Lactate] HMP > 20h HMP + 2h HMPO2 > 22h HOPE > 2h HOPE + 20h HMP
Table II. Preclinical hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion studies.
O’Callaghan et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidney allografts on transplant outcomes (2013) 49.
Study Year Study design Donor type Outcomes
Halloran et al. 1985 RCT DBD,DCD HMP ↓ DGF vs SCS No difference PNF, AR, long-term renal function or patient survival
Mozes et al. 1985 RCT DBD
Heil et al. 1987 RCT DBD
Danielewicz et al. 1996 RCT DBD,DCD
Van der Vliet et al. 2001 RCT DCD
Moers et al. 2008 RCT DBD,DCD
Watson et al. 2010 RCT DCD
Tingle et al. Hypothermic machine perfusion is superior to static cold storage in deceased donor kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis (2020) 50.
Study Year Study design Donor type Outcomes
Alijani et al. 1985 Quasi-randomized DBD HMP ↓ DGF vs SCS in DBD and DCD
Halloran et al. 1985 RCT / HMP improves graft survival 1 and 3 years in DCD e DBD graft
Mozes et al. 1985 RCT DBD
Heil et al. 1987 RCT DBD
Merion et al. 1990 Quasi-randomized DBD
Veller et al. 1994 Unclear DBD
Matsuno et al. 1994 / DCD
Kwiatkowski et al. 1999 RCT DCD
Van der Vliet et al. 2001 RCT DCD
Moers et al. 2009 RCT DBD,DCD
Watson et al. 2010 RCT DCD
Chen et al. 2014 RCT DCD
Zhong et al. 2017 RCT DCD
Tedesco-Silva 2017 RCT DBD
Peng et al. Hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage in deceased donor kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2019) 51.
Study Year Study design Donor type Outcomes
Mozes et al. 1985 RCT DBD HMP ↓ DGF vs SCS
Heil et al. 1987 RCT DBD HMP improve graft survival at 3 years
Halloran et al. 1987 RCT / No difference in: PNF, graft renal function, duration of DGF, AR, postoperative hospital stay and patient survival
Jaffers et al. 1989 RCT DBD
Robert et al. 1990 RCT /
Matsuno et al. 1994 / DCD
Van der Vliet et al. 2001 RCT DCD
Kwiatkowski et al. 2009 RCT DBD
Moers et al. 2009 RCT DBD,DCD
Watson et al. 2010 RCT DCD
Tedesco-Silva et al. 2017 RCT DBD
Wang et al. 2017 RCT DCD
Zhong et al. 2017 RCT DCD
Bellini et al. Machine perfusion for abdominal organ preservation: a systematic review of kidney and liver human grafts (2019) 52.
Study Year Study design Donor type Outcomes
Amaduzzi et al. 2011 RCT DCD HMP ↓ PNF and DGF
Bellini et al. 2019 Retrospective DBD, DCD ↑ one-year transplant survival
Dion et al. 2015 Retrospective DBD, DCD, ECD No difference in serum creatinine or post-transplant eGFR
Forde et al. 2012 Retrospective DBD, ECD
Forde et al. 2016 Retrospective ECD
Gallinat et al. 2012 RCT DBD-DCD
Gallinat et al. 2015 RCT ECD
Gallinat et al. 2017 Prospective DBD
Guy et al. 2015 Prospective DCD, ECD
Jochmans et al. 2010 RCT DBD,DCD
Kox et al. 2018 RCT DBD,DCD,ECD
Kuo et al. 2011 Retrospective DCD,DBD
Merion et al. 1990 RCT DBD
Moers et al. 2009 RCT DBD/DCD
Moustafellos et al. 2007 Retrospective DCD
Paul 2008 RCT ECD
Plata-Munoz 2010 Retrospective DCD
Sedigh 2013 Retrospective ECD
Tedesco-Silva et al. 2017 RCT DBD
Wang et al. 2017 RCT DCD
Yao et al. 2016 Prospective DCD
Yuan et al. 2014 Prospective DCD
Table III. Clinical studies. HPM vs SCS
Study Year Study design Donor type Outcomes
Jochmans et al. 54 2020 Randomised, doubleblind, paired, controlled DCD HMPO2: ↓ post-transplant complications ↑ graft survival at 12 months post-transplant ↓ relative risk of AR in patients treated with oxygenated
HMPO2 vs HMP
Husen et al. 55 2021 Prospective, randomized, parallel group, participant-blinded, controlled, multicenter DBD-ECD No differences
SCS alone vs SCS + end-HMPO2
Ravaioli et al. 56 2020 Prospective interventional arm with a retrospective case-controlled arm, pilot non-randomized DBD-ECD HOPE ↓ DGF
SCS (SCS-K) vs SCS+HOPE (HOPE-K)
Table IV. Clinical studies. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion.

References

  1. Gritsch H, Blumberg J. Campbell-Walsh Urology. (Wein A, Kavoussi R, Partin A, eds.). Elsevier; 2016.
  2. Rosengard B, Feng S, Alfrey E. Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor. Am J Transplant. 2002;2:701-711. doi:https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20804.x
  3. Metzger R, Delmonico F, Feng S. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:114-125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-6143.3.s4.11.x
  4. Friedewald J, Samana C, Kasiske B. The kidney allocation system. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93:1395-1406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2013.08.007
  5. Dahmen M, Becker F, Pavenstädt H. Validation of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) to assess a deceased donor’s kidneys’ outcome in a European cohort. Sci Rep. 2019;9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47772-7
  6. Wadei H, Heckman M, Rawal B. Comparison of kidney function between donation after cardiac death and donation after brain death kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2013;96:274-281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e31829807d1
  7. Summers D, Johnson R, Allen J. Analysis of factors that affect outcome after transplantation of kidneys donated after cardiac death in the UK: a cohort study. Lancet. 2010;376:1303-1311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60827-6
  8. Nemes B, Gámán G, Polak W. Extended-criteria donors in liver transplantation Part II: reviewing the impact of extended-criteria donors on the complications and outcomes of liver transplantation. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;10:841-859. doi:https://doi.org/10.1586/17474124.2016.1149062
  9. Feng S, Goodrich N, Bragg-Gresham J. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:783-790. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01242.x
  10. Zulpaite R, Miknevicius P, Leber B. Ex-vivo kidney machine perfusion: therapeutic potential. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.808719
  11. Humphries A, Russell R, Ostafin J. Successful reimplantation of dog kidney after 24-h storage. Surg Forum. 1962;13:380-382.
  12. Belzer F, Ashby B, Dunphy J. 24-hour and 72-hour preservation of canine kidneys. Lancet. 1967;2:536-538. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90498-9
  13. Collins G, Bravo-Shugarman M, Terasaki P. Kidney preservation for transportation. Initial perfusion and 30 hours’ ice storage. Lancet. 1969;2:1219-1222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(69)90753-3
  14. Moers C, Smits J, Maathuis M-H. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:7-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0802289
  15. Hamar M, Selzner M. Ex-vivo machine perfusion for kidney preservation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2018;23:369-374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000524
  16. Czigany Z, Lurje I, Tolba R. Machine perfusion for liver transplantation in the era of marginal organs-New kids on the block. Liver Int. 2019;39:228-249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13946
  17. Eshmuminov D, Leoni F, Schneider M. Perfusion settings and additives in liver normothermic machine perfusion with red blood cells as oxygen carrier. A systematic review of human and porcine perfusion protocols. Transpl Int. Published online 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13306
  18. Bae C, Pichardo E, Huang H. The benefits of hypothermic machine perfusion are enhanced with Vasosol and α-tocopherol in rodent donation after cardiac death livers. Transplant Proc. 2014;46:1560-1566. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.12.050
  19. Gregorini M, Corradetti V, Pattonieri E. Perfusion of isolated rat kidney with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells/Extracellular Vesicles prevents ischaemic injury. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21:3381-3393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13249
  20. Rigo F, De Stefano N, Navarro-Tableros V. Extracellular vesicles from human liver stem cells reduce injury in an ex-vivo normothermic hypoxic rat liver perfusion model. Transplantation. 2018;102:e205-e210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002123
  21. De Deken J, Kocabayoglu P, Moers C. Hypothermic machine perfusion in kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2016;21:294-300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000306
  22. Jochmans I, Akhtar M, Nasralla D. Past, present, and future of dynamic kidney and liver preservation and resuscitation. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:2545-2555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13778
  23. Ravaioli M, Baldassare M, Vasuri F. Strategies to Restore Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) level after more than 20 hours of cold ischemia time in human marginal kidney grafts. Ann Transplant. 2018;23:34-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.12659/aot.905406
  24. Tingle S, Figueiredo R, Moir J. Machine perfusion preservation versus static cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011671.pub2
  25. Faenza A, Catena F, Nardo B. Kidney preservation with university of Wisconsin and Celsior solution: a prospective multicenter randomized study. Transplantation. 2001;72:1274-1277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200110150-00016
  26. Darius T, Nath J, Mourad M. Simply adding oxygen during hypothermic machine perfusion to combat the negative effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury: fundamentals and current evidence for kidneys. Biomedicines. 2021;9. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9080993
  27. Catena F, Coccolini F, Montori G. Kidney preservation: review of present and future perspective. Transplant Proc. 2013;45:3170-3177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.145
  28. Hendriks K, Brüggenwirth I, Maassen H. Renal temperature reduction progressively favors mitochondrial ROS production over respiration in hypothermic kidney preservation. J Transl Med. 2019;17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-2013-1
  29. Abaci H, Shen Y, Tan S. Recapitulating physiological and pathological shear stress and oxygen to model vasculature in health and disease. Sci Rep. 2014;4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04951
  30. Gallinat A, Efferz P, Paul A. One or 4 h of “in-house” reconditioning by machine perfusion after cold storage improve reperfusion parameters in porcine kidneys. Transpl Int. 2014;27:1214-1219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.12393
  31. Chatauret N, Coudroy R, Delpech P. Mechanistic analysis of nonoxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion’s protection on warm ischemic kidney uncovers greater eNOS phosphorylation and vasodilation. Am J Transplant. 2014;14:2500-2514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12904
  32. He N, Li J, Jia J. Hypothermic machine perfusion’s protection on porcine kidney graft uncovers greater akt-erk phosphorylation. Transplant Proc. 2017;49:1923-1929. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.05.011
  33. Nath J, Smith T, Patel K. Metabolic differences between cold stored and machine perfused porcine kidneys: a 1H NMR based study. Cryobiology. 2017;74:115-120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.11.006
  34. Ponticelli C. Ischaemia-reperfusion injury: a major protagonist in kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:1134-1140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft488
  35. Westendorp W, Leuvenink H, Ploeg R. Brain death induced renal injury. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2011;16:151-156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0b013e328344a5dc
  36. Collard C, Gelman S. Pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:1133-1138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200106000-00030
  37. Maenpaa C, Shames B, Van Why S. Oxidant-mediated apoptosis in proximal tubular epithelial cells following ATP depletion and recovery. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;44:518-526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.10.040
  38. Zhang Y, Fu Z, Zhong Z. Hypothermic machine perfusion decreases renal cell apoptosis during ischemia/reperfusion injury via the Ezrin/AKT pathway. Artif Organs. 2016;40:129-135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12534
  39. Schlegel A, Muller X, Mueller M. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion protects from mitochondrial injury before liver transplantation. EBioMedicine. 2020;60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103014
  40. Kron P, Schlegel A, de Rougemont O. Short, cool, and well oxygenated – HOPE for kidney transplantation in a rodent model. Ann Surg. 2016;264:815-822. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001766
  41. Hoyer D, Gallinat A, Swoboda S. Influence of oxygen concentration during hypothermic machine perfusion on porcine kidneys from donation after circulatory death. Transplantation. 2014;98:944-950. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000000379
  42. Patel K, Smith T, Neil D. The effects of oxygenation on ex-vivo kidneys undergoing hypothermic machine perfusion. Transplantation. 2019;103:314-322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002542
  43. Thuillier R, Allain G, Celhay O. Benefits of active oxygenation during hypothermic machine perfusion of kidneys in a preclinical model of deceased after cardiac death donors. J Surg Res. 2013;184:1174-1181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.071
  44. Darius T, Vergauwen M, Smith T. Brief O2 uploading during continuous hypothermic machine perfusion is simple yet effective oxygenation method to improve initial kidney function in a porcine autotransplant model. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:2030-2043. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15800
  45. Land W. Emerging role of innate immunity in organ transplantation: part I: evolution of innate immunity and oxidative allograft injury. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2012;26:60-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2011.05.001
  46. Kron P, Schlegel A, Muller X. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion: a simple and effective method to modulate the immune response in kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2019;103:e128-e136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002634
  47. Treckmann J, Moers C, Smits J. Machine perfusion versus cold storage for preservation of kidneys from expanded criteria donors after brain death. Transpl Int. 2011;24:548-554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01232.x
  48. O’Callaghan J, Morgan R, Knight S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidney allografts on transplant outcomes. Br J Surg. 2013;100:991-1001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9169
  49. Tingle S, Figueiredo R, Moir J. Hypothermic machine perfusion is superior to static cold storage in deceased donor kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis. Clin Transplant. 2020;34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13814
  50. Peng P, Ding Z, He Y. Hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage in deceased donor kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Artif Organs. 2019;43:478-489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13364
  51. Bellini M, Nozdrin M, Yiu J. Machine perfusion for abdominal organ preservation: a systematic review of kidney and liver human grafts. J Clin Med. 2019;8. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081221
  52. Gallinat A, Amrillaeva V, Hoyer D. Reconditioning by end-ischemic hypothermic in-house machine perfusion: a promising strategy to improve outcome in expanded criteria donors kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant. Published online 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12904
  53. Jochmans I, Brat A, Davies L. Oxygenated versus standard cold perfusion preservation in kidney transplantation (COMPARE): a randomised, double-blind, paired, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396:1653-1662. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32411-9
  54. Husen P, Boffa C, Jochmans I. Oxygenated end-hypothermic machine perfusion in expanded criteria donor kidney transplant: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2021;156:517-525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0949
  55. Ravaioli M, De Pace V, Angeletti A. Hypothermic oxygenated new machine perfusion system in liver and kidney transplantation of extended criteria donors: first italian clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2020;10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62979-9
  56. Ravaioli M, De Pace V, Comai G. Successful dual kidney transplantation after hypothermic oxygenated perfusion of discarded human kidneys. Am J Case Rep. 2017;18:1009-1013. doi:https://doi.org/10.12659/ajcr.905377
  57. Hall I, Bhangoo R, Reese P. Glutathione S-transferase iso-enzymes in perfusate from pumped kidneys are associated with delayed graft function. Am J Transplant. 2014;14:886-896. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12635
  58. van Smaalen T, Beurskens D, Hoogland E. Presence of cytotoxic extracellular histones in machine perfusate of donation after circulatory death kidneys. Transplantation. 2017;101:e93-e101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001590
  59. Bissolati M, Gazzetta P, Caldara R. Renal resistance trend during hypothermic machine perfusion is more predictive of postoperative outcome than biopsy score: preliminary experience in 35 consecutive kidney transplantations. Artif Organs. 2018;42:714-722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13117
  60. Chen G, Wang C, Zhao Y. Evaluation of quality of kidneys from donation after circulatory death/expanded criteria donors by parameters of machine perfusion. Nephrology (Carlton). 2018;23:103-106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.12971
  61. Sevinc M, Stamp S, Ling J. Ex-vivo perfusion characteristics of donation after cardiac death kidneys predict long-term graft survival. Transplant Proc. 2016;48:3251-3260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.09.049
  62. Carrara C, Cravedi P, Perna A. Preimplantation histological score associates with 6-month gfr in recipients of perfused, older kidney grafts: results from a pilot study. Nephron. 2021;145:137-149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000512341
  63. Guy A, Nath J, Cobbold M. Metabolomic analysis of perfusate during hypothermic machine perfusion of human cadaveric kidneys. Transplantation. 2015;99:754-759. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000000398
  64. Bogensperger C, Hofmann J, Messner F. Ex-vivo mesenchymal stem cell therapy to regenerate machine perfused organs. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105233
  65. Kuo T, Hung S, Chuang C. Stem cell therapy for liver disease: parameters governing the success of using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:2111-2121.e21213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.015
  66. Lindoso R, Collino F, Bruno S. Extracellular vesicles released from mesenchymal stromal cells modulate miRNA in renal tubular cells and inhibit ATP depletion injury. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23:1809-1819. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2013.0618
  67. György B, Szabó T, Pásztói M. Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68:2667-2688. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-011-0689-3
  68. Bruno S, Deregibus M, Camussi G. The secretome of mesenchymal stromal cells: role of extracellular vesicles in immunomodulation. Immunol Lett. 2015;168:154-158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2015.06.007
  69. Konala V, Mamidi M, Bhonde R. The current landscape of the mesenchymal stromal cell secretome: a new paradigm for cell-free regeneration. Cytotherapy. 2016;18:13-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.10.008
  70. Erpicum P, Weekers L, Detry O. Infusion of third-party mesenchymal stromal cells after kidney transplantation: a phase I-II, open-label, clinical study. Kidney Int. 2019;95:693-707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.08.046
  71. Sierra-Parraga J, Munk A, Andersen C. Mesenchymal stromal cells are retained in the porcine renal cortex independently of their metabolic state after renal intra-arterial infusion. Stem Cells Dev. 2019;28:1224-1235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2019.0105
  72. Rampino T, Gregorini M, Germinario G. Extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stromal cells delivered during hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion repair ischemic/reperfusion damage of kidneys from extended criteria donors. Biology (Basel). 2022;11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11030350
  73. Contreras J, Vilatoba M, Eckstein C. Caspase-8 and caspase-3 small interfering RNA decreases ischemia/reperfusion injury to the liver in mice. Surgery. 2004;136:390-400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2004.05.015
  74. Zhang X, Zheng X, Sun H. Prevention of renal ischemic injury by silencing the expression of renal caspase 3 and caspase 8. Transplantation. 2006;82:1728-1732. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000250764.17636.ba
  75. Thijssen M, Brüggenwirth I, Gillooly A. Gene silencing with siRNA (RNA Interference): a new therapeutic option during ex-vivo machine liver perfusion preservation. Liver Transpl. 2019;25:140-151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25383

Downloads

PDF
Authors

Giorgia Radi - Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Guido Fallani - Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Giuliana Germinario - Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Marco Busutti - Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Gaetano La Manna - Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Matteo Ravaioli - Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright

Copyright (c) 2023 European Journal of Transplantation

How to Cite
[1]
Radi, G., Fallani, G., Germinario, G., Busutti, M., La Manna, G. and Ravaioli, M. 2023. HYPOTHERMIC PERFUSION OF THE KIDNEY: FROM RESEARCH TO CLINICAL PRACTICE. European Journal of Transplantation. 1, 2 (Mar. 2023), 79–91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.57603/EJT-011.
  • Abstract viewed - 1456 times
  • PDF downloaded - 270 times