This website uses only technical or equivalent cookies.
For more information click here.

Register Login Submit an Article

PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND REGENERATIVE SURGERY

Abstract

Uterus transplantation represents the only opportunity for women affected by absolute uterine factor infertility to become pregnant. One of the major challenges in uterus transplantation is represented by the high rate of thrombotic complications, often resulting in graft loss and poor outcomes. Although the exact etiology remains unknown, it is possible that post-implantation thrombosis of the uterine vessels could be the expression of microcirculation failure resulting from ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI). Uterus machine perfusion could offer a way to ameliorate IRI and protect the graft from vascular complications. Thanks to the experience gained in solid organ ex-situ perfusion, it can be speculated that the uterus graft could benefit from different perfusion techniques: hypothermic oxygenated perfusion would reduce the ischemia reperfusion injury, with an impact on graft, recipient and offspring outcomes that is currently unknown; normothermic machine perfusion would allow graft reconditioning, flow measurements and graft testing in a near-physiological environment, helping the physician to understand the relationship between flow, pressure and myometrial function. Lastly, machine perfusion could play a major role in improving the logistics of uterus transplantation, resulting in a safe expansion of the preservation time.

Abbreviations

ALT: alanine aminotransferase

AST; aspartate aminotransferase

ATP: adenosine triphosphate

AUFI: absolute uterine factor infertility

CIT: cold ischemia time

DD: deceased donor

HMP: hypothermic machine perfusion

HOPE: hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion

IRI: ischemia reperfusion injury

LD: living donor

MP: machine perfusion

NMP: normothermic machine perfusion

ROS: reactive oxygen species

SCS: static cold storage

UT: uterus transplant

VCAs: vascularized composite allografts

INTRODUCTION

Uterus Transplantation (UT) represents a valid alternative to surrogacy and adoption in women with absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI). AUFI affects 3-5% of the female general population 1,2 and it can be caused by the complete absence of the uterus (congenital uterine agenesis, previous hysterectomy) or uterine malformations (uterine myomas, adhesions, congenital malformations), leading to implantation failure or placentation defects 3. Although UT is not a life-saving procedure, it is the only possible treatment for AUFI 4 and remarkable improvements have been made over the last decade in the field of uterine transplantation 5.

In the past, numerous attempts of UT in animal models have been made 3. In the modern age, the first UT performed in humans goes back to 2000 in Saudi Arabia, where a 26-year-old female was transplanted with a uterus from a 46-year-old living donor 6. Three months later, unfortunately, the recipient underwent a hysterectomy due to a vascular thrombosis, which led to graft necrosis. The first birth following UT took place in Sweden in 2014 7. The recipient was a 35-year-old woman with congenital absence of the uterus who was transplanted with a uterus from a 61-year-old living donor 8. In the US, the first birth from a living donor (LD) occurred in Texas in 2017 9 and the first baby born after a deceased donor (DD) UT was in Cleveland - OH in 2019 10.

Machine perfusion (MP) improves outcomes in solid organ transplantation such as liver and kidney, leading to an expansion of the donor pool. MP in UT is an innovative concept that aims to lower the recipient morbidity through the reconditioning and assessment of a relatively new graft and improve the outcomes of both recipient and offspring. Although significant efforts have been made to reduce recipient morbidity in a non-life-saving procedure such as UT, approximately 20% of the reported implanted grafts underwent early hysterectomy due to vascular thrombosis 11. It is still unclear whether there is a common cause responsible for thrombi development in the graft after transplantation; therefore, the prediction and prevention of this major complication represents a real challenge for this emerging procedure.

In the uterus graft, inflow and outflow structures are represented by the uterine arteries and veins in the LD and by the internal iliac vessels in the DD. It could be argued that the diameter of the anastomosed vessels plays only a marginal or no role in thrombosis, which occurs in both LD and DD grafts at similar rates, whereas a major contribution to this vascular complication could be given by the microcirculation failure that follows ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI) of the graft. Moreover, a co-factor that could trigger thrombi development can be found in the physiologic low flow of the uterus, which is mainly a resting muscle outside of a pregnancy. These graft characteristics along with microcirculation injury following IRI could trigger blood stasis and vascular thrombosis.

ISCHEMIA REPERFUSION INJURY IN VASCULARIZED COMPOSITE ALLOGRAFTS

Given its heterogeneous tissue composition, UT falls into the category of vascularized composite allografts (VCAs). VCAs donation and transplantation is an emerging area of transplant surgery that involves the transplantation of multiple different tissues, such as skin, bone, muscle, body vessels, connective tissue, and nerves either from a deceased or a living donor. For instance, VCAs include upper and lower limbs transplant, face, musculoskeletal segments, glands (such as parathyroids), and genitourinary organs (penis, uterus) 12-15.

As for solid organs, VCAs are affected by IRI 16,17. The deprivation of oxygen occurring during the static cold storage (SCS) determines an ischemic injury of cells triggered by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion, mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction and acidosis. Ischemia per se determines a depletion of ATP, causing the cells to switch to anaerobic glycolysis, leading to acidosis, succinate accumulation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, and therefore, impairment of cell function. The damaging effects of ischemia on cells are subsequently aggravated once the blood flow is restored during reperfusion 18. Additionally, prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) and subsequent IRI trigger an inflammatory cascade that contributes to acute and chronic rejection in solid organ transplantation 18-21.

IRI in VCAs appears to be even more challenging to study, given these organs’ heterogeneous histological composition and varying degrees of susceptibility to ischemia. For instance, muscle seems particularly vulnerable to cold ischemia compared to other tissues due to its elevated metabolism 22, and the degree of myocyte damage correlates with prolonged CIT 23. The damage that occurs in the muscle manifests with edema, caused by an increase in endothelial permeability induced by inflammation in the tissue. This process eventually leads to cell dysfunction and necrosis. In addition, edema is responsible for raising the muscle pressure, leading to a compression of thin-walled capillaries and reduced blood flow, as previously demonstrated in the limbs 24-26. Experimental models on the limb showed that the degree of myocyte damage correlates with CIT and becomes irreversible after 3-6 hours of SCS 27,28. Van der Heiden et al. demonstrated that after 16 hours of SCS at least 25% of muscle fibers were necrotic and unresponsive to electrical stimulation 23. Another structure that happens to be very vulnerable to cold ischemia is vasculature. Upon ischemia, the integrity of the endothelial barrier is lost, leading to pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulatory pathways activation 29 and nitric oxide levels reduction, resulting in poor tissue perfusion and hypoxia 30.

UTERUS PHYSIOLOGIC PERFUSION

Uterus hemodynamics changes widely during pregnancy: in a non-pregnant woman, uterine artery physiologic blood flow is approximately 94, 5 mL/min, receiving 3% of the cardiac output, whereas during the second and third trimester the flow increases tremendously, reaching a bilateral flow of 605.6 ± 220.5 mL/min and a mean velocity of 58.9 ± 19.5 cm/s for each artery, which represents about 10% of the cardiac output 31,32. Interestingly, up to date no hemodynamic complication or thrombi development have been reported after the first trimester in transplanted uteri, suggesting that the physiologic hemodynamic changes in pregnancy do not impact on graft vascular complications.

Another major difference between non-pregnant and pregnant uterine tissue is placentation and the consequent hemodynamic changes that occur in the uterus during pregnancy. At beginning of pregnancy, the remodeling of the spiral uterine arteries, that occurs to supply nutrients to the fetus, leads to a lowering in the velocity and rate of the blood flow from the uterus to the placenta 33. One of the main causes of preeclampsia, for instance, is believed to be an altered remodeling of the spiral arteries, which determines an increased resistance to flow and consequently a faster flow, resulting in malperfusion of the uterine-placental tissue 34.

It can be speculated that one of the physiological changes that develop during pregnancy could be even protective: the increase of the left atrial volume index between both the first and second trimester and the second and third trimester correlates with parameters of doppler ultrasound of the fetal circulation and the uterine artery 35. This maternal cardiovascular adaptation, which is a result of the uterus and fetal growth, might play a protective role in modulating the correct uterus perfusion according to the graft request. Moreover, further physiological changes that involve uterine arteries and veins such as matrix remodeling, circumferential artery enlargement due to shear stress and nitric oxide release could represent one of the reasons why most hemodynamic-related complications occurred during the first two weeks after transplantation.

As previously demonstrated in the kidney, MP plays a role in modulating the vascular resistances of the organ prior to transplantation. For instance, HMP tends to reduce vascular renal resistances during perfusion in kidneys 36 and as a result of HMP reconditioning effect, the grafts show better outcomes and a lower rate of delayed graft failure (DGF) 37, especially in ECDs 38,39 and DCDs 40 organs. It is not proved yet if MP reduce intratissue resistance in the human uterus graft, however this would represent an improvement that should not be underestimated for an organ with high resistance, lowering blood stasis and improving tissue perfusion.

From a surgical perspective, one of the main peculiarities of the uterus as a transplantable organ consists in the presence of two hila, each of them involving one inflow and two outflows. The inflow is represented by the uterine artery for each side, whereas the outflow is represented by the inferior uterine vein and that tract of vein that goes from the uterus fundus to the ovary defined as the superior uterus vein. Notably, the gonadal vein can be used if ovary sacrifice would not represent an issue in the donor, as it happens in DD.

MACHINE PERFUSION APPLICATION IN UTERUS TRANSPLANTATION

Modulation of IRI, viability assessment, immunological tolerance and logistic improvement are the pillars of dynamic preservation. The role of MP in improving graft and patient outcomes after transplantation has already been proven and different MP techniques are currently being introduced in clinical practice 41. In solid organs, such as liver and kidney, the superiority of MP over SCS is clear and some benefits include lower rates of primary graft nonfunction and graft dysfunction, prolonged preservation time and reduced CIT 41. Up to date, no human uterus has been transplanted after MP. However, according to the results achieved in kidney, liver and VCAs transplantation, MP could also play a key role in UT, given its potential in IRI modulation, flow measurements and graft viability assessment and feasibly preventing graft thrombosis, one of the major complications reported to date in UT.

As firstly described by Virchow in 1856, thrombosis occurs in the presence of endothelial damage, stasis and hypercoagulation state 42. In UT, MP could find an application in modulating and studying all of these three aspects. The injury to the endothelial wall of a vessel alters blood flow dynamics, resulting in turbulence. This can depend on the quality of the graft (e.g. presence of irregular atheroma, bifurcations in the vessel, stenosis) or be a consequence of the procurement. Herein, MP would give an objective evaluation of the graft quality before implantation. Blood stasis can be caused by several factors, including microcirculation failure and outflow obstruction: MP holds the potential to both protect microcirculation against IRI and allow outflow evaluation before transplant. Furthermore, IRI modulation would result in a milder immunological response in the recipient, lowering the risk of a hypercoagulative state.

MP to modulate IRI

The MP role in IRI modulation in VCAs has been investigated in both animal and human studies. Our colleagues from the Cleveland Clinic proved that a swine limb can be perfused with ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) up until 12 hours, maintaining normal compartment pressure (16.4 ± 8.20 mmHg), minimal weight increase (0.54 ± 7.35%), and mean muscle temperature of 33.6 ± 1.678 °C 43. Although an increase at the end of perfusion of myoglobin and creatine kinase concentrations of 875 ± 291.4 ng/mL and 53344 ± 14850.34 U/L, respectively, muscle contraction was present in all limbs until the end of NMP 43. Animal studies 43-45 were confirmed by Werner et al. 46, which studied 5 human limbs after 24 hours of NMP. The authors found that neuromuscular electrical stimulation continually displayed contraction until the end of perfusion, with no changes in the maximum fiber isometric force or response to nerve stimulation. Moreover, vascular resistance was stable and histology showed no difference in fascicular architecture and shape, and no necrosis was reported at 0, 12 and 24 hours.

A previous attempt to extracorporeal perfusion of the human uterus was made in 2000 47. In this study, human uteri were subjected to 37°C extracorporeal perfusion with oxygenated Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer, to simulate an in vivo situation. The results showed well-preserved myometrium and endometrium and no cellular edema, demonstrating that the viability and function of the organ could be maintained up to 24-hour perfusion time.

Up to date, viability assessment in UT remains an unexplored territory and yet a very crucial one. The uterus is mainly composed of muscle, the myometrium, which is particularly susceptible to the duration of CIT. There are multiple ways to test an organ for viability during transplantation: for the liver, we can assess bile production, lactates clearance, AST/ALT levels, bilirubin levels, coagulation factor synthesis and several parameters that can be measured during MP, such as cholangiocytes function or metabolism markers 48,49. The success of a liver transplant and therefore the functionality of the organ can be assessed within days or weeks after surgery. UT success, on the other hand, is determined by not only the organ function but also the delivery of a healthy baby, which can take years 2. In this scenario, MP could be a great tool to assess the organ’s viability prior to transplantation, not only to recognize potentially damaged grafts but also for organ reconditioning to prevent major UT complications and improve global outcomes in recipient and offspring.

In a study conducted in 2005, the tolerability of the human uterus to cold ischemia was tested 50. Grafts were preserved in cold storage (4°C) for 6 and 24 hours, in different preservation solutions. One parameter used to test the tissue viability is the ability of the myometrium fibers to generate spontaneous contractions, which resulted to be better preserved in the 6 h group.

We speculate that IRI modulation through MP might lead to a microcirculation enhancement, allowing physiologic perfusion parameters and, therefore, lowering the risk of graft thrombosis.

MP to evaluate uterus flows

Theoretically, in ex-situ NMP, a uterus graft with a significant turbulent flow, low flow and a high resistance would be less suitable for a transplant. Furthermore, MP would allow an evaluation of every inflow site of the uterus, which includes the right and the left uterine arteries, and the outflow sites, that is right and left inferior uterine veins and right and left superior uterine veins 51. Knowing these data could be of utmost importance for the surgeon to decide on organ viability, but also the best vascular anastomotic site according to the hemodynamic parameters. For instance, poor venous drainage from the inferior uterine veins detected during NMP would lead to an optimization of the outflow through venous anastomoses of the superior uterine or ovarian veins, which could be monolateral or bilateral.

Furthermore, according to our transplant technique, we reperfuse the uterus graft after one side anastomosis to reduce the recipient’s warm ischemia time. Although we begin with the vascular site that flushes better at the back table (i.e. has the lower resistance), a hemodynamic value registered during NMP would be an objective and better parameter to choose which side should be anastomosed first.

While in NMP we can compare in-situ physiologic hemodynamics with ex-situ parameters, in hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) we expect to have lower flow and higher resistance than normothermia, and a comparison parameter is currently lacking.

Kristek et al. 52 reported the outcomes of the first 51 women who underwent UT, describing hysterectomy due to graft thrombosis in 19.6% (n = 10) of the recipients, which occurred in all the cases except for one within the first two postoperative weeks. Notably, 10 out of 12 graft failures (83.3%) occurred because of vascular thrombosis. A possible cause of thrombosis was found in focal atherosclerosis in 4 cases, vessel kinking due to graft displacement, artery dissection, and vein compression due to external hematoma in one case, whereas the cause was unknown in three recipients. In the Cleveland Clinic series, three recipients experienced venous graft thrombosis resulting in one graft lossaz. In all cases no technical/anatomical issues were at the origin of the thrombosis.

Focal atherosclerosis in uterine arteries and/or internal iliac arteries could be difficult to predict considering the procurement technique that imposes the collection of a wide parametrium tissue to avoid injury to the anastomotic vascularization 53. Furthermore, the amount of focal atherosclerosis could be difficult to interpret and its role to predict grafts failure may be very subjective. Ex-vivo uterus MP would allow an objective interpretation of the vasculature patency and resistance through flow measurements.

Future studies should focus on recipient selection considering uterine vessels’ flows, velocity, and resistance and how the procurement and the IRI impact them, comparing flows and resistances between in-situ uteri and ex-situ normothermic perfused grafts.

POTENTIAL MACHINE PERFUSION DEMAND IN UTERUS TRANSPLANT AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

UT transplantation is a novel field with great potential, being the only method for women with AUFI to be pregnant. Assessing the real demand for UT is very challenging for many reasons. Firstly, not all women suffering from AUFI wish to have children. Secondly, there may be other medical, financial, psychosocial or logistical barriers that would preclude couples from accessing uterus transplantation. Data from adoption databases are also difficult to interpret; however, adoption and surrogacies can be very challenging or even not possible, depending on where people live and other societal variables.

Based on AUFI prevalence, it can be roughly estimated that between 3000-5000 women could be interested in uterus transplantation in the USA every year. However, in the near future, women with previous hysterectomy would access UT, rising the number of potential UT candidates to around 70000/year in the US only 54-56. Therefore, lowering morbidity, optimization of donor-recipient selection, donor pool expansion and logistic improvement will be critical factors to improve in the future and MP holds the potential to improve all these four aspects.

HOPE could potentially modulate IRI through reduction of ROS production, less inflammatory response and improve immune tolerance as it happens in the liver. The subsequent microcirculation enhancement might reduce graft failure and thrombosis development, which should be a focus of future studies.

Ex-situ NMP would represent a near-physiological environment for uterus viability assessment looking for myometrium contraction, response to flow modulating drugs, myorelaxants or vasodilators. Moreover, flow measurements of uterine arteries and veins flow can be studied deeper, in order to understand whether there is an association between a low-flow uterus type and complications development, such as graft failure due to thrombus formation, and a threshold of acceptable risk should be identified.

The ischemia-free technique would be a promising technique to apply to UT because the favorable anatomy of this organ. As mentioned, the uterus has two hila and a total of two inflows and four outflows. This anatomical peculiarity could make this organ suitable for ischemia-free perfusion technique, allowing ex-vivo perfusion to start before disconnecting the second hilum, and end the perfusion right after the graft in-situ reperfusion, through the first vascular side.

Normothermic regional perfusion would play a role in donor pool extension; however, it might find an application only if standard criteria DD and LD cannot supply the UT demand.

In conclusion, MP holds the potential to improve outcomes, facilitate donor-recipient matching in deceased donation, improve transplant logistics and extend the preservation time without compromising graft viability.

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors’ contributions

LDP, BC, CQ: conceptualized the ideas and concepts expressed in the manuscript; LDP, BC, CQ: wrote the article. All the Authors gave intellectual contribution to the manuscript and participated in the revision and approval of the final draft.

Ethical consideration

The research was conducted ethically, with all study procedures being performed in accordance with the requirements of the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki.

Written informed consent was obtained from each participant/patient for study participation and data publication.

References

  1. D’Amico G, del Prete L, Eghtesad B. Immunosuppression in uterus transplantation: from transplant to delivery. Expert Opin Pharmacother. Published online 2022:1-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2022.2090243
  2. Brännström M, Dahm KP, Greite R. Uterus transplantation: a rapidly expanding field. Transplantation. 2018;102:569-577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002035
  3. Human uterus transplantation in focus | Enhanced Reader. Br Med Bull. 2016;117:69-78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldw002
  4. Hur C, Rehmer J, Flyckt R. Uterine factor infertility: a clinical review. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;62:257-270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000448
  5. Jones B, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T. Human uterine transplantation: a review of outcomes from the first 45 cases. BJOG. 2019;126:1310-1319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15863
  6. Fageeh W, Raffa H, Jabbad H. Transplantation of the human uterus. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2002;76:245-251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00597-5
  7. Brännström M, Johannesson L, Bokström H. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. The Lancet. 2015;385:607-616. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61728-1
  8. Brännström M, Johannesson L, Dahm-Kähler P. First clinical uterus transplantation trial: a six-month report. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1228-1236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.024
  9. Testa G, McKenna G, Gunby R. First live birth after uterus transplantation in the United States. American Journal of Transplantation. 2018;18:1270-1274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14737
  10. Flyckt R, Falcone T, Quintini C. First birth from a deceased donor uterus in the United States: from severe graft rejection to successful cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:143-151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.001
  11. Kristek J, Johannesson L, Novotny R. Human uterine vasculature with respect to uterus transplantation: a comprehensive review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46:2199-2220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14428
  12. Brännström M, Dahm KP, Greite R. Uterus transplantation: a rapidly expanding field. Transplantation. 2018;102:569-577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002035
  13. Morrison S, Shakir A, Vyas K. Phalloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:594-615. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002518
  14. Diaz-Siso J, Bueno E, Sisk G. Vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation - state of the art. Clin Transplant. 2013;27:330-337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12117
  15. Berli J, Broyles J, Lough D. Current concepts and systematic review of vascularized composite allotransplantation of the abdominal wall. Clin Transplant. 2013;27:781-789. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12243
  16. Burlage L, Tessier S, Etra J. Advances in machine perfusion, organ preservation, and cryobiology: potential impact on vascularized composite allotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2018;23:561-567. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000567
  17. Caterson E, Lopez J, Medina M. Ischemia-reperfusion injury in vascularized composite allotransplantation. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2013;24:51-56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827104e1
  18. Messner F, Grahammer J, Hautz T. Ischemia/reperfusion injury in vascularized tissue allotransplantation: tissue damage and clinical relevance. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2016;21:503-509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000343
  19. Liu L, Yang D, Li X. Effect of long cold ischemia time of kidneys from aged donors on prognosis of kidney transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2021;26. doi:https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.928735
  20. Satoh S, Yada R, Inoue H. Toll-like receptor-4 is upregulated in plaque debris of patients with acute coronary syndrome more than Toll-like receptor-2. Heart Vessels. 2016;31:1-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-014-0565-9
  21. Mannon R. Macrophages: contributors to allograft dysfunction, repair, or innocent bystanders?. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2012;17:20-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0b013e32834ee5b6
  22. Siemionow M, Arslan E. Ischemia/reperfusion injury: a review in relation to free tissue transfers. Microsurgery. 2004;24:468-475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20060
  23. van der Heijden E, Kroese A, Stremel R. Contractile properties of rat skeletal muscles following storage at 4 degrees C. Clin Sci (Lond). 1999;97:45-57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1042/cs19980324
  24. Gillani S, Cao J, Suzuki T. The effect of ischemia reperfusion injury on skeletal muscle. Injury. 2012;43:670-675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.008
  25. Azari K, Imbriglia J, Goitz R. Technical aspects of the recipient operation in hand transplantation. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012;28:27-34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1285820
  26. Belzer F, Southard J. Principles of solid-organ preservation by cold storage. Transplantation. 1988;45:673-676. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-198804000-00001
  27. Hautz T, Hickethier T, Blumer M. Histomorphometric evaluation of ischemia-reperfusion injury and the effect of preservation solutions histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin in limb transplantation. Transplantation. 2014;98:713-720. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000000300
  28. Burlage L, Tessier S, Etra J. Advances in machine perfusion, organ preservation, and cryobiology: potential impact on vascularized composite allotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2018;23:561-567. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000567
  29. Foster G, Mittleman M, Koch M. Variability in the measurement of intracoronary ultrasound images: implications for the identification of atherosclerotic plaque regression. Clin Cardiol. 1997;20:11-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960200105
  30. Tousoulis D, Kampoli A-M, Tentolouris C. The role of nitric oxide on endothelial function. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2012;10:4-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/157016112798829760
  31. Hwuang E, Vidorreta M, Schwartz N. Assessment of uterine artery geometry and hemodynamics in human pregnancy with 4d flow MRI and its correlation with doppler ultrasound. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49:59-68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26229
  32. Page S, Rollins M. Pharmacology and Physiology for Anesthesia (second ed.). (Hemmings H, Egan T, eds.). Elsevier; 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-48110-6.00037-5
  33. Burton G, Woods A, Jauniaux E. Rheological and physiological consequences of conversion of the maternal spiral arteries for uteroplacental blood flow during human pregnancy. Placenta. 2009;30:473-482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2009.02.009
  34. Burton G, Redman C, Roberts J. Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology and clinical implications. BMJ. 2019;366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2381
  35. Dobrowolski P, Kosinski P, Prejbisz A. Longitudinal changes in maternal left atrial volume index and uterine artery pulsatility indices in uncomplicated pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224:221.e1-221.e15.
  36. Bissolati M, Cerchione R, Terulla A. Renal resistance trend during hypothermic machine perfusion correlates with preimplantation biopsy score in transplantation of kidneys from extended criteria donors. Transplantation Proc. 2021;53:1823-1830. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.03.036
  37. Jochmans I, Moers C, Smits J. The prognostic value of renal resistance during hypothermic machine perfusion of deceased donor kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2214-2220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03685.x
  38. Bissolati M, Gazzetta P, Caldara R. Renal resistance trend during hypothermic machine perfusion is more predictive of postoperative outcome than biopsy score: preliminary experience in 35 consecutive kidney transplantations. Artif Organs. 2018;42:714-722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13117
  39. Jiao B, Liu S, Liu H. Hypothermic machine perfusion reduces delayed graft function and improves one-year graft survival of kidneys from expanded criteria donors: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081826
  40. Deng R, Gu G, Wang D. Machine perfusion versus cold storage of kidneys derived from donation after cardiac death: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056368
  41. Czigany Z, Lurje I, Tolba R. Machine perfusion for liver transplantation in the era of marginal organs – new kids on the block. Liver International. 2019;39:228-249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13946
  42. Kushner A, West W, Pillarisetty L. Virchow Triad. Published online 2022.
  43. Duraes E, Madajka M, Frautschi R. Developing a protocol for normothermic ex-situ limb perfusion. Microsurgery. 2018;38:185-194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30252
  44. Ozer K, Rojas-Pena A, Mendias C. The effect of ex-situ perfusion in a swine limb vascularized composite tissue allograft on survival up to 24 hours. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41:3-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.003
  45. Constantinescu M, Knall E, Xu X. Preservation of amputated extremities by extracorporeal blood perfusion; a feasibility study in a porcine model. J Surg Res. 2011;171:291-299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.01.040
  46. Werner N, Alghanem F, Rakestraw S. Ex-situ perfusion of human limb allografts for 24 hours. Transplantation. 2017;101:e68-e74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001500
  47. Richter O, Wardelmann E, Dombrowski F. Extracorporeal perfusion of the human uterus as an experimental model in gynaecology and reproductive medicine. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1235-1240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.6.1235
  48. Panconesi R, Carvalho M, Mueller M. Viability assessment in liver transplantation – what is the impact of dynamic organ preservation?. Biomedicines. 2021;9:1-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9020161
  49. Brüggenwirth I, de Meijer V, Porte R. Viability criteria assessment during liver machine perfusion. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:1260-1262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0720-z
  50. Wranning C, Mölne J, El-Akouri R. Short-term ischaemic storage of human uterine myometrium – basic studies towards uterine transplantation. Human Reproduction. 2005;20:2736-2744. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei125
  51. Johannesson L, Testa G, Flyckt R. Guidelines for standardized nomenclature and reporting in uterus transplantation: an opinion from the United States Uterus Transplant Consortium. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:3319-3325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15973
  52. Kristek J, Johannesson L, Novotny R. Human uterine vasculature with respect to uterus transplantation: a comprehensive review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46:2199-2220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14428
  53. D’Amico G, Quintini C, Eghtesad B. Uterus recovery from deceased donor: simple technique securing safety of vital organs and uterus graft. J Am Coll Surg. 2021;232:e1-e6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.007
  54. Oppelt P, Lermann J, Strick R. Malformations in a cohort of 284 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-10-57
  55. Nair A, Stega J, Smith J. Uterus transplant: evidence and ethics. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1127:83-91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1434.003
  56. Keshavarz H. Histerectomy surveillance - United States, 1994-1999 - CDC. Published online 2002.

Downloads

PDF
Authors

Luca Del Prete - General and Liver Transplant Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

Beatrice Cazzaniga - Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA

Qiang Liu - Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA

Teresa Diago-Uso - Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA

Koji Hashimoto - Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA

Cristiano Quintini - Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright

Copyright (c) 2023 European Journal of Transplantation

How to Cite
[1]
Del Prete, L., Cazzaniga, B., Liu, Q., Diago-Uso, T., Hashimoto, K. and Quintini, C. 2023. THE CONCEPT OF MACHINE PERFUSION IN UTERUS TRANSPLATATION. European Journal of Transplantation. 1, 2 (Mar. 2023), 155–162. DOI:https://doi.org/10.57603/EJT-018.
  • Abstract viewed - 392 times
  • PDF downloaded - 97 times